 |
96/97: Reports:
Nationwide League Division 2, 4/3/97
Peterborough United 2(1)
Scorers: Charlery (31), Boothroyd (57 pen)
Watford 1(1)
Team: Miller 2, Gibbs 2, Robinson 3, Page 3, Millen 2, Bazeley 2, Palmer 1, Johnson 3, Phillips 2, *Scott 3*, Mooney 2
Subs: Ludden (for Robinson) 2, Noel-Williams (for Scott) 2, Ward
Scorers: Mooney (2)
Dire, dire, dire
Report by Nick Grundy
This was, to be frank, pathetic. It was on a par with the three hours of
tedium and mind-numbingly dreadful football which made up the
Gillingham/Notts County double whammy, and this is not just because we
lost. It's because we looked a lot worse than the collection of Watford
rejects and Barry Fry special buys which made up the Peterborough team,
and were lucky only to concede two.
Part of the blame for this, I'm afraid, has to lie at the KJ's
door. From the start it was clear we had come for a battling sort of a
game, and while the conditions were awful, surely he's realised by now
that the Palmer/Johnson midfield pairing just DOESN'T WORK. They've
looked good playing alongside each other in one game (Oxford) that I've
seen, and even then they were bashing clearances into each other half
the night. I was almost certain that Clint Easton would be in last night's
team; okay, he's played in a fair number of games recently, but we've had
one of our best runs while he's been in the side and he hasn't looked tired
or jaded yet. We really do need a creative midfielder to play (as our
recent run has perhaps proved), whether it's Easton, Penrice, (a fit) Porter,
Ramage or whoever; last night's team didn't have one in the side or on
the bench and suffered enormously as a result.
This is the final grumble before I depress you all by talking
about the game; what on earth were we doing with two defenders and a
striker on the bench when two of our midfield had only just come back
into the first team - Palmer through suspension and Mooney through injury.
It was ridiculous; when you've won your last few games and played fairly
well, then surely to goodness if you must change a winning team (thereby
breaking football adage no. 162), then keep the players who've made a
difference in the squad. It was really painful realising that, at 2-1
down, with Steve Palmer having mare of a game and with Tommy on his last
legs we had no one to bring on in midfield. It seems awfully obvious
with hindsight who should have been on the bench - Clint can play on both the
left and the centre of midfield.
Anyway, on to the game. The conditions in Peterborough were
bad; it had been raining off and on in Cambridge most of the day and, judging
by the state of the pitch, similarly in Peterborough. The pitch looked
broadly similar to the one I used to play on at school; the middle of
both penalty areas was grass-free, and the overall condition can best be
described as swampy. It was also quite foggy, so while the other end of
the pitch was visible from the away end, details were hard to pick out.
And so it proved two minutes in when we won our first corner of
the game. I think Darren Bazeley took it, as I recognized his hair at a
later corner, but I can't be sure, and all we saw in the away end was
the ball get centred and nodded firmly down into the corner of the net after
(I think) a near-post flick (I think) by (I think) Scott. Cue a certain
smug over-confidence in yours truly as I thought about our defence,
league position, and capacity for not conceding goals.
Our defence is, after all, one of the best in the football league, isn't it? Not on last night's showing it
bloody isn't. Right from the start we were embarassingly crap at the back. I can only truly
illustrate how bad by pointing out that the Peterborough forward line of Ken
Charlery (yes, that Ken Charlery) and Roger Willis (yes, that Roger Willis)
looked good against us. Miller, while retaining his ability to stop shots,
flapped at a lot of stuff in the air, failed to claim several
straightforward low crosses, and didn't shout at the rest of the defnece
enough for being, well, crap. Gibbs was at best anonymous and at worst
terrible, while Millen and Page looked seriously shaky against the
aforementioned messrs Willis and Charlery, especially in the air. I can
remember Page winning a few headers, albeit not in his usual nonchalant
battering ram style, but Beefy Keithy I can't recall doing anything
really impressive all game.
I can't even be bothered to catalogue the succession of chances
that we presented to the Peterborough strikeforce half by half; early on
Paul Robinson let Louie Donowa skin him for pace a couple of times, and
the crosses were headed goalwards when they should have been cleared.
Robinson, unlike the rest of the defence, adapted to the problems of
pace he faced, and gradually improved throughout the half. He also gets
'pass of the match' for one ball hammered forward 40 yards or so at
grass-cutting height directly to the feet of SuperKev. What a pity no
one in midfield could match his range of passing and ability to find
players' feet.
Other chances we gave them came from an innocuous cross low
along the six yard box which an unpressured Page and Miller came for and then
left for each other, it was cleared by Robbo; a succession of runs by Otto
which Gibbsie failed to deal with; innumerable flick ons by Charlery and
Willis; several unamusingly pathetic incidents where someone fell over; a
free header from about four yards which went straight into Miller's
arms; a shot from about the same distance which Charlery somehow managed to
put over the bar (by a gratifyingly large amout, as it happens) and a ball
which ?Millen? was shepherding out for a corner which Miller came for,
and they both allowed Willis to get a foot in and direct the ball all the
way across the goalmouth and just wide of the post. To be brutally honest,
they could have had three by half time and so many by full time it
doesn't bear thinking about.
Their first goal is rather symptomatic of the problems with our
defense and midfield. Shortly before half time, Otto picked the ball up
out on their right, and brought it forward to the edge of the box. At
this point Palmer and Gibbs were both between him and the goal, although
Gibbs had been backing off him for about four days before trying to stop
him. Somehow - it might have been a rebound - he played the ball
across. At this point they had three men on two - only one of the centre backs
and Robbo were anywhere to be seen - and ?Willis? had time to turn with it
eight yards from goal, draw the centre half and touch it across for
Charlery to slot it past Miller.
And if he ever celebrates a goal in front of opposition fans
again, I hope the ref books him and I hope he tries it against Millwall
and some huge fat brainless moron runs out onto the pitch and explains
the error of his ways to him in some suitably violent fashion, because
that's what I felt like doing. Still, he's going down anyway.
One-all, then, and looking grim. Service to the forwards had
been much too little and too poor, Steve Palmer wasn't anything like his
usual self (as our catalogue of defensive problems show), Mooney was giving it
loads but was tiring even at this stage, while Bazeley didn't see enough
decent ball to give him the chance to have a go at his full-back. In
all this morass of awfulness, Keith Scott stood out (not much, but it didn't
take a great deal). He was always able to bring the ball down and lay
it off sensibly and to feet, he won some ball in the air, and take on
defenders. SuperKev did most of the same things, but had problems due
to the fact that his teammates seemed to have decided that he'd grown
several feet since scoring three on Saturday.
Peterborough's captain and centre half had gone off by this stage,
but at no point in the second half did we bother to run at the defence
or to try to pass through them, preferring instead to hoof it forward.
This was especially noticeable towards the end, when we'd been kicking it
aimlessly forward for about fifteen minutes without any results, and yet
continued to do so till the final whistle.
The only interesting parts of the second half were a header from
Phillips from a Mooney cross which Griemink (who, by the way, resembles
a muppet) just tipped over - there was a shot first half from Mooney, too,
incidentally, which was an absolute piledriver, which he managed to save
- and another attempt by Baze to 'do a Northampton' - he missed by about
six inches. Having said that, some of his decisions were poor; he was much
too willing to put shoddy crosses over rather than take on his fullback,
and shot when he should have crossed.
Other things are the substituition of Scott for the Gift - a
pretty bloody silly decision given that we weren't even pretending to
play it to feet and Scott had been our best player - and their penalty. I'm
afraid that I'm not going to say it was an outrageous decision, because
to be honest I could see bugger-all about it. I know it was Marcus Ebdon
who got taken down because Barry Fry said so on the radio, and I thought it
was Ludden who felled him, but I honestly couldn't see. Boothroyd scored anyway,
and it was just miserable from there on in.
I suppose I should say something about our luck having to run out
eventually, and I suppose this wasn't the end of the world - I still
think we've got a good chance of promotion - but it was the manner in which we
played which depressed me. The fact is that in a lot of the games where
we've played badly we haven't actually looked like losing - Notts County,
Gillingham, and perhaps Wycombe as well? - but last night we looked like
losing from about twenty minutes in, and we played very, very badly. It
was a frankly embarassing and humiliating end to an unbeaten run which,
whatever you may think about it, was a great achievement, and I only
hope this signals the start of us winning more games as well as losing more.
|